Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>
> Duane Wessels wrote:
> >
> > If we get a write failure on a swapout, the total swap space
> > size is reduced to the current store_swap_size, but we don't
> > adjust the individual store_dir's because we don't bother to
> > work out which cache_dir the failed write was on.
> >
> > Duane W.
>
> Which means that if one cache_dir disk is gone, then Squid reduces the
> cache to 0?
>
> /Henrik
I think squid would simply fail to start if a cache_dir was
inaccessible...which is far more likely (IMO) than it being accessible,
but reading 0 bytes available.
D
Received on Tue Jul 29 2003 - 13:15:51 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:11:51 MST