>>> "Stephen R. van den Berg" wrote
> >Hmm. Isn't there one swaplog per cache disk?
>
> Yes, but you can configure where they should be put. I put all
> swapfiles together on a separate disk.
Um, under load won't that mean that one disk gets somewhat overloaded?
> *That* is actually rather depressing. I get somewhere between 10% and 50%
> depending on the time of day. The average being, I think, around 24%.
> I would have guessed that with such a large cache, the byte-hit ratio
> would rise.
It depends what's downstream - if it's just end-users, you get good
numbers. If it's other caches, your numbers just suck.
Anthony
Received on Tue Jul 29 2003 - 13:15:53 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:11:53 MST