On Wednesday 04 September 2002 02.40, Robert Collins wrote:
> If we define object as 'any non informal reply struct optionally
> followed by object body data'. Then yes, I agree with you.
I define object as primarily a reply entity == entity headers + data
(if allowed for the request method). But your definition is also fine
and easier to manage from a protocol perspective. Same effect, less
conditions.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Tue Sep 03 2002 - 18:45:39 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:16:25 MST