Ok,
I don't think that we need full multipart/byteranges support for 3.0
- it's not present on 2.5.
In 2.5, if we do the range ourself, it will also work in the fix-ranges
branch.
However, if we don't do the ranges ourself, then we simply pass through
the object, as a rangeless reply.
So, for 3.0 I plan to do the following:
If we decide not to do ranges on a multipart range request:
* Mark the object as uncachable.
* Delete the range request metadata.
Thoughts?
Rob
-- GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:19:07 MST