Re: preX for squid-3.0?

Hi,

At 01.10 27/01/2003, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>The auth fixes is waiting for you to bring them into CVS when you are
>happy with their state.
>
>Lets try to keep the PRE cycle of 3.0 relatively short. Do not go into
>PRE unless you seriously expect that there won't be any more major
>changes or additions before STABLE.
>
>I have not paid close attention to 3.0 yet due to various reasons
>(kind of stuck in 2.5 at the moment) so I cannot say I have much of a
>opinion what 3.0.STABLE should have or what may be missing. I can
>however offer to bring over some of the basic aspects of rproxy to
>allow for more sane reverse proxy setups if wanted
>
>rproxy detail:
> * http[s]_port options for "originserver" mode operations
> * cache_peer relations to origin servers
>
>Regards
>Henrik
>

And what about merging Windows port and the new Robert's IPC code ?

Regards

Guido

>On Friday 24 January 2003 10.58, Robert Collins wrote:
> > What's missing to start a release cycle for squid 3.0? The ESI work
> > needs some tweaking before further merges to HEAD.
> >
> > The 2.5 Stable 2 auth fixes I'll bring across to 3.0 as and when
> > they go into CVS.
> >
> > So...... thoughts?
> >
> > Rob

-
=======================================================
Serassio Guido
Via Albenga, 11/4 10134 - Torino - ITALY
E-mail: guido.serassio@serassio.it
WWW: http://www.serassio.it
Received on Mon Jan 27 2003 - 00:59:20 MST