Re: Tidying up the deferred reads

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:46:08 +0200 (CEST)

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Adrian Chadd wrote:

> I'd like some feedback please. If it works out my plan is to
> replace the FTP, WAIS and Gopher (eww) code with this.
> The SSL code will need a little more thought as it doesn't pass
> through fwdCheckDeferRead() like the others.

The CONNECT tunnel code is pretty isolated from everything else. The defer
function in there is only used for delay pools, and can be moved inline to
sslSetSelect() instead I think.

How do you handle delay pools for the other protocols without deferred
reads?

Regards
Henrik
Received on Fri Oct 14 2005 - 04:46:10 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Nov 01 2005 - 12:00:07 MST