Re: Download hanging

On Sat, Aug 05, 2006, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> Ideally delay pools would kick the I/O going again when the pool have
> been filled up, and we could then get rid of the periodic repoll of
> deferred connections relying almost exclusively on
> storeDeferRead/storeResumeRead signaling to indicate when I/O should
> take place. (not sure delay pools should be using these.. probably the
> low level commDefer/ResumeFD like today, but maybe..)

I mostly had that working in my branch but I didn't get around to
coding what delay pools would have needed.

Steven's stuff was in use and I decided to just go with what he had
rather than having two parallel branches. But my branch is there
(tidyup_deferred_reads) if anyone wants to pull the code out and
finally kill deferred reads for good.

adrian
Received on Sat Aug 05 2006 - 02:47:08 MDT