Re: Low portability of logfile-daemon support

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:45:31 +0800

On Sat, Aug 19, 2006, Guido Serassio wrote:

> >Perhaps replace it with a memBufPrintf to be consistent with the rest of
> >the code?
>
> Sure, correct.

It only uses asprintf to write the control data (rotate and buffering.)
It doesn't use asprintf to write the logfile data out.

Adrian
Received on Sat Aug 19 2006 - 08:44:17 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 12:00:03 MDT