Hi Henrik,
At 23.49 31/08/2006, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>tor 2006-08-31 klockan 18:34 +0200 skrev Guido Serassio:
>
> > >How much are we actually dependent on this runtime library?
> >
> > Totally: all C/C++ standard functions are here: file I/O, strings,
> > memory allocation, etc
>
>I meant to ask what in the new runtime do we depend on or benefit from
>compared to the old.
Currently the new runtime seems to implement all the old functions.
Some of the new functionality are:
- Run-time function parameter validation
- "ll" (long long) size support for printf and long long type
- Some compatibility updates: atoi(), snprintf() family, errno
handling, fopen(), open(), ....
- All the not documented bug fixes .... :-)
Today there is no special need of the new runtime. But it will be
mandatory for a full 64 bit Windows binary. (but this is a still
remote problem, there some other problem to solve before .... ).
> > Sure, on MinGW both 2.6 and 3.0 nt branches can be boostrapped,
>
>Cool. Wasn't aware that MinGW has such complete toolchain.
Only some optimization in configure and in lib files is still needed.
Regards
Guido
-
========================================================
Guido Serassio
Acme Consulting S.r.l. - Microsoft Certified Partner
Via Lucia Savarino, 1 10098 - Rivoli (TO) - ITALY
Tel. : +39.011.9530135 Fax. : +39.011.9781115
Email: guido.serassio@acmeconsulting.it
WWW: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/
Received on Thu Aug 31 2006 - 16:32:17 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 12:00:03 MDT