> On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 01:33 +0000, wiki@squidwiki.kinkie.it wrote:
>> - * '''Developer''': ["Henrik Nordström"]
>> + * '''Developer''': ["Henrik Nordström"], others welcome
>
> I suspect my "Developer" label may have an _unintended_ assumption that
> others are not welcome to work on the feature that already has a
> developer. This may cause changes like the one sampled above.
>
> I do believe that each feature on the TODO list (and many on the Wish
> List) should have a single person responsible for orchestrating the
> required work, but I do not want to imply that others are not welcome.
>
> Eventually, we may be able to extract people names from the feature
> tables and remind them of their responsibilities or award them for their
> work. Having a formal contact name would help with that automation as
> well.
>
> Should we rename the "Developer" field into "Point-of-contact",
> "Coordinator", or (horror!) "Manager"? Any better ideas?
>
Co-Ordinator?
Architect?
chief contact?
adjutant
'Garggleblaster'? ;-)
'Developer Contact' or 'Point of Contact' seems good to me.
Amos
Received on Tue Oct 09 2007 - 15:23:05 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Oct 30 2007 - 13:00:03 MDT