Henrik, please raise this as an issue against 2616 (if you haven't
already).
Cheers,
On 2007/11/15, at 1:47 PM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On tor, 2007-11-15 at 11:49 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>>> However, there is still the HTTP/1.0 "MUST NOT cache"
>>> requirement. Not
>>> really an idea what that's about however.
>>
>> If people -are- returning freshness info in a ? URL then its entirely
>> possible they've got clue, right? Or not?
>
> Exactly.
>
> And what is "from an HTTP/1.0 server"? The next hop, or do it refer to
> the protocol version of the origin server (which can't be deduced that
> easily).
>
> Regards
> Henrik
-- Mark Nottingham mnot@yahoo-inc.comReceived on Thu Nov 15 2007 - 17:24:28 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 12:00:05 MST