Re: Making start/stop idempotent

Hmm, good point. My aim was just start and stop. Seem reasonable to
just limit it to those two?

On 30/10/2008, at 9:52 AM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> How soft should this be? Do we really want "-k rotate/reconfigure/
> debug
> etc" to consider Squid not running to be a normal situation?
>
> Well, rotate maybe, to avoid cron jobs failing.
>
> But certainly not reconfigure.
>
>
> On tor, 2008-10-30 at 09:46 +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> This tests for opt_send_signal == 0.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 29/10/2008, at 12:13 PM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>>
>>> On ons, 2008-10-29 at 11:32 +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>>> I'm not seeing that; no crash, and -k check still correctly finds
>>>> syntax errors in squid.conf. Behaviour appears the same as without
>>>> the
>>>> patch.
>>>
>>> "squid -k check" is for checking if Squid is running.
>>>
>>> "squid -k parse" is the one parsing the config only..
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Henrik
>>
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com
>>
>>

--
Mark Nottingham       mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com