Re: [MERGE] 1/2: Populate cache_mem on disk hits

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> tor 2009-08-13 klockan 13:40 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov:
>
>> Henrik, please commit if you do not hear any objections. I am looking
>> forward to benchmarking this important change.
>
> Done.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>

Bah, recalled that there was a big about this too.

Now closed it, but I wonder, does this close or simply reduce the impact
of bug #7?

Am I right in thinking the in-memory copy gets demoted at some later
point back to the disk store by saving the memory copy? or is the memory
copy dropped at that point and the original disk copy used?

Amos

-- 
Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE18
   Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.13