Re: [AUDIT PATCH] ...

On 10/03/2010 07:31 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 19:16:35 -0600, Alex Rousskov
> <rousskov_at_measurement-factory.com> wrote:
>> What is the difference between [PATCH] and [AUDIT PATCH]?

> I thought I'd better do something to indicate it's not a working patch
> when committed alone. It's getting hard to weed out my list of [PATCH]
> emails pending the commit or audit fixes, even after deleting the ones that
> are superseded.
>
> If its annoying I'll drop the idea of extra words there

Your call. I just do not understand the mnemonic.

Since you are the one who is most likely to commit the patch, I would
just mention the dependency in the cover email to squid-dev. I do hear
your pain with pending changes interdependencies though. FWIW, I
maintain project states elsewhere and only group/search squid-dev
[PATCH] emails to track patch reviews and approvals (what bb use to do
for us).

Cheers,

Alex.
Received on Mon Oct 04 2010 - 16:32:41 MDT