Re: Trying to improve the stability of the OpenBSD build nodes

From: Kinkie <gkinkie_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:16:21 +0200

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Kinkie <gkinkie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> OpenBSD is not unsupported past 5.0 nowdays. I've dropped 4.8 from the
>>> stable branch matrix, left 4.9 there. But was wondering if we should
>>> continue to test on 4.8/4.9 at all on 3.2+
>>
>> Well, the build issues there are squid-caused from what I can see,
>> caused by the unavailability of Shm and failures to properly link in
>> the wake of its absence - it may be the only platform we have which
>> doesn't support shm and  this may be its value.
>> Apart from that, I'll just set up a new OpenBSD node and drop the
>> older ones, no problem.
>
> Hm.. OpenBSD 5.1 on amd64 is having kernel crash issues on kvm.
> I'll try x86.

The x86 OpenBSD 5.1 node seems stable; if nobody objects I'll
gradually dismiss the other nodes.

-- 
    /kinkie
Received on Tue Jun 19 2012 - 17:16:30 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 20 2012 - 12:00:09 MDT