On 10.09.2012 01:12, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> On 9/9/2012 2:54 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>
>> ++ It is questionable whether the store-URL should also be below
>> the
>> no_cache_done bits as well. Since requests with"cache deny" are not
>> going to be loaded from cache, but maybe they will be stored later
>> by
>> future Squid (which will need store-URL changes then) - in current
>> squid
>> they are useless passing to the storeurl helper.
> When we will be there then...
> Are there any visible plans?
Not as yet. It just shows up as a HTTP/1.1 non-compliance TODO entry
about making "Cache-Control:no-cache" from the client prevent cache read
but allow cache write instead of having it discard the response.
Amos
Received on Sun Sep 09 2012 - 22:51:58 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Sep 10 2012 - 12:00:03 MDT