tis 2012-09-11 klockan 15:52 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov:
> Hm... I wonder if we are making a design mistake here by following
> Squid2 steps: one helper to rewrite request URL, one helper to rewrite
> store URL, then one helper to rewrite some special HTTP header, etc.
> Would it be better to extend (in a backward compatible way) the URL
> rewriter interface so that ONE helper can do all rewriting that is
> needed (today and tomorrow)?
haven't really seen that as a problem.
url & store url fits nicely in the same helper I think, but requires
redefining the interface a bit, currently there is no defined manner for
url rewriters to return anything else.
not sure about headers, that would require a completely new helper
interface, and have significant overhead for url rewriting.
What about using eCAP? Is it possible to return extra attributes such as
store url?
Regards
Henrik
Received on Tue Sep 11 2012 - 23:15:36 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Sep 12 2012 - 12:00:05 MDT