On 01/24/2013 12:51 PM, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> linked-list implementation will be good enough because [...]
> I don't think it should be discarded as
> 'not good enough' based on assumptions alone.
Why not? If a simple model shows significant overhead, and there are no
known reasons to doubt that model, why is that not a sufficient
justification to try alternatives that have lower overhead?
Alex.
Received on Thu Jan 24 2013 - 21:20:36 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jan 25 2013 - 12:00:09 MST