You've got a good point...
But what it seems the person had said was that he placed copies of the
files/programs to be ftp'ed locally from his machine. If that's the case,
it's different than simply caching it; it's almost like creating an
unauthorized mirror.
I guess it's up to interpretation; if it's a result of caching I guess
we'd have no control of it, but I wouldn't store these files locally (not
as cached).
On Thu, 12 Sep 1996, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> At 15:11 12/09/96 -0700, Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
> >
> >You just better hope that Netscape & microsoft don't find out about
> >this... ;-)
> >
> >It is NOT legal to store their files/programs and then make them
> >available to others, don't forget that...
>
> So e.g. a Netscape proxy cache shouldn't be allowed to cache downloaded
> versions of Netscape then? Bizarre. Are you sure about that?
>
> Jonathan L.
> Origin IT Services Ltd., 323 Cambridge Science Park, Cambridge, England.
> Tel: +44 (1223) 423355 Fax: +44 (1223) 420724 E-mail: guess...
> -------[ Do not think that every sad-eyed woman has loved and lost... ]------
> -----------------------[ she may have got him. -Anon ]-----------------------
> These opinions are all my own fault.
>
Received on Thu Sep 12 1996 - 15:34:08 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:33:00 MST