Brad Dixon wrote:
>
> Why do all these have an expire date of 27 years ago ... everyone of them have it and I
> can't work it our.. ??
Maybe it's because Jan 1, 1970 (the Epoch) was 27 years ago? I
haven't looked at the source, but it would make sense to me that
a timestamp that is not present for the object in question (being
implemented as 0 or -1 or something like that) shows up as the
equivalend of Jan 1, 1970 00:00:00 UTC or Dec 31, 1969 23:59:59
UTC.
It would make even more sense to explicitely show those
timestamps as not being applicable, if that indeed is what is
happening.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dipl.-Inform. Martin Ibert, BB-DATA GmbH, phone: +49-30-245-56582 Brunnenstraße 111, D-13355 Berlin, Germany, fax: +49-30-245-56577 --------------------------------------- mailto:mib@ppe.bb-data.deReceived on Tue Jan 07 1997 - 22:26:13 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:34:00 MST