Hi,
Kevin Littlejohn wrote:
> A quick question: Does Squid use the access time on the various files for
> anything?
No.
> If not, would there be any bad effects from applying the
> no_atime kernel patch for Linux, that doesn't update the access time on
> files/directories when updating files?
Good idea, this is the patch that was done for news, right?
> Related question: How much time does file handling take? ie. Is it worth
> putting these sorts of patches in place, or is the networking/database
> code going to slow things down more anyway?
For us, it seems to be mostly network bound. I think it found its
use for news since people pull the same articles over and over again.
I guess it's worth a try?
-- miguel a.l. paraz <map@iphil.net> | pgp key id: 0x43F0D011 iphil communications, makati city, philippines | <http://www.iphil.net>Received on Wed Jan 22 1997 - 02:20:37 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:34:09 MST