Re: Cisco Cache Director (Was RE: Does Squid beat the rest? )

From: Andrew Cormack <Cormack@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 09:09:01 +0100 (BST)

On Mon, 29 Sep 1997, Oskar Pearson wrote:

> if you calculate the hash on the entire URL, including the /dir/file.html
> bit, you will end up with sites being completely scattered, and the loss
> of a cache will effect all sites very slightly, rather than one specific
> site

True if the hash is based on the whole URL. The situation which got me
thinking was if the hash used only the hostname portion. The same
situation could arise if caches were told to specialise in particular
domains. At one stage our national cache was experimenting with this sort
of configuration, but I never heard of any results. I think the NLANR
caches have a similar setup too: have they had any comments from users
about the possible failure mode ?

Andrew

--
       +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
       | Andrew Cormack               | email: cormack@cardiff.ac.uk     |
       | Information Systems Support, | snail: 40/41 Park Place, Cardiff |
       |    postmaster and webmaster  |        CF1 3BB                   |
       | University of Wales, Cardiff |                                  |
       | Web page and PGP key: http://www.cf.ac.uk/People/cormack.html   |
       +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
Received on Tue Sep 30 1997 - 01:21:15 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:37:12 MST