Re: squid ip cache or local named?

From: Keith Heinemann <khman@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 12:32:38 -0500 (EST)

> does anyone what's the better solution: Using squid's ip caching
> or installing a local named 8.1.1 ?

Id say both. Squids ipcache only holds specifically looked up info,
whereas a local named holds recursive info on many servers/domains.
Problem w/ relying soley on named is (at least ver 4.9) can only handle
one lookup at a time, and thus makes programs doing lookups wait. Use
both.

                        -keith

>
> Cheers,
> Dirk
>
> --
> Dirk Vleugels
>
> FTP- & Proxy-Services UUnet Deutschland GmbH
> Tel. +49 231 972 00 Emil-Figge-Strasse 80
> Fax. +49 231 972 1180 44227 Dortmund, Germany
> Dirk.Vleugels@de.uu.net URL: http://www.uunet.de
>
Received on Wed Jan 14 1998 - 09:34:38 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:38:25 MST