I have squids running on both OSF v3.2g and v4.0b, and default kernel
setting for filedescriptors is set at 4096..
98/02/17 14:53:08| Starting Squid Cache version 1.1.18 for
alpha-dec-osf3.2...
98/02/17 14:53:08| With 4096 file descriptors available
98/02/17 15:06:15| Starting Squid Cache version 1.1.18 for
alpha-dec-osf4.0...
98/02/17 15:06:15| With 4096 file descriptors available
But then of course my usage doesn't even touch 500, therefore I can't
comment when filedescriptor usage rises above 1000...
Wai Sun
----------
From: Dancer[SMTP:dancer@brisnet.org.au]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 1998 9:03 PM
To: Andrew Cormack
Cc: Squid Discussion List
Subject: Re: Squid on DECUnix (was Stop - Start...)
That would be my gut feeling, but I don't think the gut feeling of one
person is
enough to make this sort of decision on. It's quite possible that
there are setups
using digital unix that _don't_ experience this problem at all. If so,
I'm sure
they'll put their hands up.
Personally, when there's performance issues like this, I prefer to
_test_ a setup,
before I commit.
D
Andrew Cormack wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 1998, Dancer wrote:
>
> > Once a Digital Unix box hits a certain mark of open
filedescriptors (across
> > all processes), then it suddenly seems to start thrashing
somewhere deep down.
> > I've had the number 1800 quoted at me, but it could be lower or
higher for
> > some configurations.
>
> Am I right in thinking that this makes the VM versions of squid
preferable
> to NOVM on DigitalUNIX systems ? I seem to recall that NOVM trades
less
> RAM usage for more open file descriptors ? If so, then I can cross
off
> "investigate squid.NOVM" from my todo list.
>
> Thanks for any confirmation,
> Andrew
>
> --
>
+---------------------------------------------------------------
--+
> | Andrew Cormack | email: cormack@cardiff.ac.uk
|
> | Information Systems Support, | snail: 40/41 Park Place,
Cardiff |
> | postmaster and webmaster | CF1 3BB
|
> | University of Wales, Cardiff |
|
> | Web page and PGP key:
http://www.cf.ac.uk/People/cormack.html |
>
+---------------------------------------------------------------
--+
-- Did you read the documentation AND the FAQ? If not, I'll probably still answer your question, but my patience will be limited, and you take the risk of sarcasm and ridicule.Received on Mon Feb 16 1998 - 23:54:40 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:38:54 MST