Re: cachemgr.cgi

'twas me. I had the same trouble when I started out, and it took me about that
long to figure out what it was.

I'm not _entirely_ sure if it is _intended_ to work that way....but since the
response from the cache_object is (obviously) never a cache hit, it requires
miss_access to be able to request it.

(Should go in the FAQ. Duane?)

D

Miles Lott wrote:

> > >(where 'foobar' is an ACL that refers to the machine that is running the
> > >cache-manager cgi. Most people seem to omit the miss_access line).
>
> Whoever wrote this, the part about miss access was right on the money.
> I finally got this thing to work after 3 months:)
> Thanks a bunch!

--
Did you read the documentation AND the FAQ?
If not, I'll probably still answer your question, but my patience will
be limited, and you take the risk of sarcasm and ridicule.