RE: CARP with 2.0

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Stern [mailto:estern@packetstorm.on.ca]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 1998 7:14 PM
> To: ADELINE E InfoEmiAsp
> Subject: RE: CARP with 2.0
>
> On 7 Oct 1998, ADELINE E InfoEmiAsp wrote:
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Eric Stern [mailto:estern@packetstorm.on.ca]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 1998 6:30 PM
> > > To: ADELINE E InfoEmiAsp
> > > Cc: 'squid'
> > > Subject: Re: CARP with 2.0
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6 Oct 1998, ADELINE E InfoEmiAsp wrote:
> > >
> > > > I can't get CARP working in 2.0.
> > > > Here is what I put in my squid.conf:
> > > >
> > > > cache_peer websweeper1 parent 3128 7 no-query
> carp-load-factor=0.5
> > > > cache_peer websweeper2 parent 3128 7 no-query
> carp-load-factor=0.5
> > > >
> > > > And in the access.log I only get FIRST_UP_PARENT access to
> > > websweeper1.
> > >
> > > Thos should be marked as "sibling", not "parent". When
> using CARP, you
> > > should have no parent entries at all. You should also put in
> > > "proxy-only".
> > >
> >
> > If I replace "parent" with "sibling" in squid.conf, here
> are the error
> > messages I get when I run Squid:
> >
> > parse_peer: Ignoring carp-load-factor for non parent
> websweeper1/3128
> > parse_peer: Ignoring carp-load-factor for non parent
> websweeper2/3128
>
> Remove the "carp-load-factor'. You don't need it anyways, if
> carp-load-factor is not specified it divides load evenly. I'm
> pretty sure that is a bug. I'll get a patch ready.

If I remove the "carp-load-factor", how do I specify that my peer does CARP?
By the way, is it possible to do CARP with sibling peers and parent peers?
Actually, I'd like to favor ICP relationships with siblings and CARP
relationships with parents. I am already doing this in 1.1.22 with home made
 patches. Is it possible to do the same things with a vanilla Squid 2.0?

--
Emmanuel Adeline                               +33 1 421 48306