Re: RE: RE: IE 4 && HTTP/1.1 through proxy

  I knew there was a reason for hedging - going through the docs and
ChangeLog, there was never an explicit declaration of 1.1 support, just
mention of the various features. I presume this does not invalidate the
test, though - the original question was why the distribution of
requests/connection is skewed so heavily towards 1 with IE whereas it seems
to be distributed much better and leans closer to 8-12 with NN.

On Mon, 22 Nov 1999 15:02:52 -0000, Dave J Woolley wrote:

> > From: T. Esting [SMTP:t_esting@excite.com]
> >
> > I'm fairly certain that HTTP/1.1 is supported, since squid performs
> > server-side persistent connections (see the cachemgr screen) which, as
far
> > as I recall, were not possible with HTTP/1.0. In
> >
> Squid is not 1.1 compliant but uses some 1.1 features,
> which it is allowed to do, providing it uses an HTTP/1.0
> header.
>
>

________________________________________________________________
Get FREE voicemail, fax and email at http://voicemail.excite.com
Talk online at http://voicechat.excite.com
Received on Mon Nov 22 1999 - 09:09:22 MST