Yomler wrote:
>
> If we have one cache-dir per physical disk, how squid will deal with a disk
> failure ?
It depends a bit on how your OS handles the failure, and when it is
detected. Squid will probably be a bit upset until you remove that
cache_dir entry from suqid.conf and restart it.
> If we use RAID 5, how many logical disk is it better to mount ?
If using RAID 5, then the I/O performance is effectively degraded to
only little more than one drive. This is due to the "random" I/O pattern
with small read/writes, which is very bad for RADI5 performance (RAID5
likes big or fully sequential read/writes).
> Is it better to split the RAID 5 array in several logical disks ?
Marginally.
> Is it worth to get disks in RAID 5 array ?
Probably not, but it is probably worth the effort to investigate a bit
of research in how you want disk failures to be handled. For example it
shouldn't be that hard to have a survelance script which automatically
takes out the relevant cache_dir line from Squid if a disk should fail.
-- Henrik Nordstrom Squid hackerReceived on Sun Apr 09 2000 - 11:47:06 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:52:52 MST