Re: [SQU] Transparent proxy of another upstream proxy?

From: Rodriguez Luis Felipe <felipro@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:25:42 -0500 (GMT)

It should be someting like :

access-list 100 permit tcp any host 10.1.1.1 eq 18
access-list 100 deny any any

route-map proxy permit 10
 match ip address 100
 set ip next-hop 10.2.1.1

interface ethernet 1/1 ( internal interface )
 ip policy route-map proxy

With this, all the request go to 10.2.1.1 and there must be configured a
internal redirection rule to redirect this trafic on port 81 to 10.2.1.1
on squid port. ( this is diferent from OS to OS ).
This redirection is necesary even if squid runs on port 81.

On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> Drash, Jim [EESUS] wrote:
> >
> > We have just recently implemented Squid and it is working flawlessly.
> > Here is my problem: My squid proxy is on 10.2.1.1 and I have an
> > upstream http proxy at 10.1.1.1:81 I have a number of users that have
> > a manual proxy configuration pointing to the upstream proxy. Can I
> > transparently proxy this upstream proxy. I have read the brief
> > discussion of Cisco route-maps and I show no mention of ports other
> > than www (80). I and I saw no reference to setting up one for a
> > specific destination IP address.
>
> Yes you can do so, similarly how port 80 is redirected.
>
> No, I am not a Cisco person so I don't know the exact syntax to use in
> Cisco acls for the redirection.
>
> For the server part, see the Squid FAQ.
>
> --
> Henrik Nordstrom
> Squid hacker
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
>

                                Luis Felipe Rodríguez C.
                                felipro@univalle.edu.co
----------------------------------------------------------
 Llave publica : finger -l felipro@mafalda.univalle.edu.co

--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
Received on Fri Oct 27 2000 - 16:46:59 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:56:01 MST