Re: [SQU] Transparency: WCCP vs L4

From: M. Yu <myu@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:06:35 +0800

WCCP last time I checked is a commercial product of Cisco, which means you
pay for it. L4 (correct me if i'm wrong but isn't this supposed to be in
L3?) is basically already integrated in a product you'll buy anyway (the
switch) so it's basically free.

M. Yu

--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html

Received on Tue Jan 16 2001 - 19:07:39 MST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Awie: "Re: Problem of Squid on Linux Redhat 6.2"
Previous message: Rick Francis: "[SQU] squeezer question"
In reply to: Miguel A.L. Paraz: "[SQU] Transparency: WCCP vs L4"
Next in thread: Adrian Chadd: "Re: [SQU] Transparency: WCCP vs L4"
Reply: Adrian Chadd: "Re: [SQU] Transparency: WCCP vs L4"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:57:28 MST