> Chemolli Francesco (USI) wrote:
> >
> > > Ah. Right. Well, how about you try the latest gcc to see if
> > > they've fixed it, and if they haven't, forward them the
> > > information (code snippet triggering the bug, resulting
> > > assembly code, gcc flags, etc) so they can try to fix it?
> >
> > Sorry, I forgot to add this info.
> > The GCC shipped in RH7.0 (2.96) works fine.
>
> Not entirely true. As shipped it too has plenty of bugs if
> optimization
> is enabled (btw, there is not actually a 2.96 GCC release. This is a
> development snapshot GCC).
I didn't say it was a good compiler. I just said that my code doesn't
trigger any bug from what I could gather.
This said, RH7.1 is in beta now, so I hope that they'll refrain from
doing the same mistake twice.
-- /kinkieReceived on Mon Feb 26 2001 - 00:33:11 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:58:11 MST