Re: [squid-users] Re: usage of pac

----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>
Cc: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 4:01 AM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Re: usage of pac

> ??
>
> What does AOL have to do with it? They use IE.

I don't know. maybe this is an AOL user?

> I'm far from an AOL fan, but isn't it smart of them to use caches for
> webpages? I'm sure with several million subscribers, it saves them a
lot of
> cost in bandwidth.

"transparent caching" propely called intercepting caching has
significant problems. AOL are smart for caching yes, but for using
interception no.

This has been covered before in the mail archives.

Rob

> Adam Lang
> Systems Engineer
> Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
> http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joel Jaeggli" <joelja@darkwing.uoregon.edu>
> To: "Parimi, Venkateshwara Rao" <Venkateshwara_Rao-Parimi@deshaw.com>
> Cc: "'Jorge Cuellar Martinez'" <jorge.cuellar@sat.gob.mx>; "Henrik
> Nordstrom" <hno@hem.passagen.se>; "Mike Diggins"
> <diggins@mcmail.cis.mcmaster.ca>; <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>;
"Chemolli
> Francesco (USI)" <ChemolliF@GruppoCredit.it>;
<squid-users@squid-cache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 1:23 PM
> Subject: RE: [squid-users] Re: usage of pac
>
>
> > nope... aol doesn't seem to care much, probably because they prefer
to
> > break stuff by doing transparent caching...
>
>
>
Received on Thu Apr 26 2001 - 16:29:21 MDT