I see that SuSe include my inofficial patchset in their Squid-2.3
distribution so the situation is perhaps not as bad as one could think,
but many of the bugs listed on
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.4/bugs/ will exists.
Note: I do not have a patchset for Squid-2.4 like I had for Squid-2.2
and Squid-2.4, simply because almost all of my patches have now been
integrated into mainstream Squid, including a huge amount of new fixes.
If you want information on my old (now obsolete) patchsets see
http://devel.squid-cache.org/hno/.
The officially recommended Squid version for production use is
Squid-2.4.STABLE3.
I cannot give you a personal measure on stability of the Squid-2.3 or
Squid-2.4 release as the versions I use in production are my heavily
patched Squid-2.2-hno version and my considerably extended versions of
Squid-2.5 (probably more like some future Squid-2.6 version than the
upcoming Squid-2.5 release).
Regards
Henrik Nordström
Squid Developer
"Mueller, Thomas" wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
> maybe off-topic - I hope anyone can answer me this.
> The SuSE Linux Distributions are always shipping with an RPM package of
> Squid Proxy.
> But it's normally an old version.
>
> I want to use always the newest version to test and the old one which ships
> with the package for production.
>
> Is it possible to download an compile the extracted archive under SuSE
> Linux?
> I tried this once but I don't get it to start after compiling. Is there any
> FAQ which can help me
> or any other documentation.
> I'm new to this, so maybe a "newbie doc" would be best :-)
>
> I'm happy for any hint / help on this.
>
> Thanks in Advance
> Tom
Received on Fri Jan 04 2002 - 21:54:41 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:05:38 MST