Re: [squid-users] Which squid to use?

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 01:31:01 -0700

On Tue, Jan 22, 2002, Steve Snyder wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 January 2002 04:30 pm, Joe Cooper wrote:
> [snip]
> > Seriously though, Squid 2.4STABLE3 is pretty good, and what I'm
> > deploying today. 2.2STABLE5+hno is still faster, and more stable in
> > most environments, as well...but none the less the feature set of
> > 2.4STABLE3 is enough better that it's worth giving up a little speed.
>
> Given your confident tone about 2.4STABLE3 (which I agree with), why did
> you run a beta version of Squid 2.5 in the 4th Cache-Off?

There's a few small speedups in the squid-2.5 tree, and there's a lot
more configurable options which Joe may have used.

But, it hasn't been tagged as STABLE yet, so .. :)

Adrian
Received on Wed Jan 23 2002 - 01:31:01 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:05:54 MST