On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 05:20:11AM -0800, MASOOD AHMAD wrote:
> okk share with us afer using diskd .........
Using diskd shows the same effects as aufs: a maximum of about 210
kByte/s throughput on clients as well as the server itself. No
difference between 2.4STABLE7 und 2.5STABLE1.
I recompiled Squid 2.5STABLE1 with --disable-poll. Surprise: Throughput
doubled (now about 400 kByte/s) for diskd and aufs while ufs still
delivers very high (and expected) performance.
Another surprise: I let two wget request the same URI (one wget on the
Squid Cache server system, one on a network client). While both are
running throughput rises to 1.3 MByte/s (diskd) resp. 6.0 MByte/s
(aufs). Maybe there is a bug in the thread handling in Squid or glibc
(I'm using 2.2.5)?
Kind regards,
Stephan
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:12:15 MST