RE: [squid-users] still getting basic auth when ntlm should be wo rking

I found the problem.

I had an older version of squid with basic authentication running on a
different port, when I installed 2.5Stable1 the clients were still picking
up the authentication from the old version of squid. Once I disabled this
ntlm authenication worked fine, thank you for all your help.

-----Original Message-----
From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@squid-cache.org]
Sent: 31 January 2003 7:29
To: Anthony Giggins
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] still getting basic auth when ntlm should be
working

Have you configured the correct auth_param ntlm directives in
squid.conf?

Check your configurarion with "squid -k parse".

also, is there any output in cache.log?

Regards
Herik

Anthony Giggins wrote:
>
> I have recently setup NTLM auth on a test machine by following the FAQ
> http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-23.html step by step.
>
> Everything tested out OK up untill final client testing using IE i still
get
> the basic authentication, No Domain just username/password. I found a
> similar problem in the archives
> http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/200209/0804.html but
it
> does not say that he resolved the problem, I have also emailed Paul to
> cofirm if he resolved his problem.
>
> I have no tried sniffing the connection yet but according to Paul's post
> Squid was offering ntlm auth in his case.
>
> Can anyone give any suggestions?
>
> Thanks
>
> This email is confidential and may contain confidential and/or copyright
> material of SynergyIT. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify
> us immediately and delete all copies of this message. It is the
> responsibility of the recipient to virus scan this email.

This email is confidential and may contain confidential and/or copyright
material of SynergyIT. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
us immediately and delete all copies of this message. It is the
responsibility of the recipient to virus scan this email.
Received on Mon Feb 03 2003 - 14:35:54 MST