Re: [squid-users] squid using more bandwidth!!!

From: Sukhjit Singh <sukhjits@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 07:50:46 +0530

Dear Ahmad,

i am using squid in an ISP invironment,
The squid is getting the following number of requests according to mrtg.
      Max HTTP requests 406.0 req/min Average HTTP requests 152.0
req/min Current HTTP requests 32.0 req/min

according to cachemgr
Byte Hit Ratios: 5min: 12.1%, 60min: 10.6%

according to mrtg the cache stats of # hits
      Max Hostname-to-Address Hits 129.2 k (25.8%) Average
Hostname-to-Address Hits 39.3 k (7.9%) Current Hostname-to-Address Hits
96.1 k

I will not be able to use cache without wccp there are some network
limitations here.

   Regards

   Sukhjit Singh
   Network Administrator
   Emmsons Infotech Ltd.
   SCO 13-14-15, Sec 34A,
   Chandigarh-160 022
   (Ph): +91 172 606664
   Mobile 9815228132
   sukhjits@emmtel.com
   http://www.emmtel.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ahmad Masood Shah" <masood@ipsec.fibre.net.pk>
To: "Sukhjit Singh" <sukhjits@emmtel.com>; "squid list"
<squid-users@squid-cache.org>; "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] squid using more bandwidth!!!

> Sukhjit,
>
> I had told you before that, You can check in cachemgr or mrtg byte hit
> ratio, this is what you are saving in bandwidth. Respected Henrik, already
> have told you some tips to save a little bandwidth quick_abort_max set to
0
> and also quick_abrot_min set to 0 KB. But I think it is not the problem.
Can
> you let us know in which enviornment you are using squid ISP or Software
> house. What about request/sec..
> onething more if you have single cache then no need to use wccp you can
use
> simple redirect (route map). no need to put extra load on router and cache
> for capsulating and deccaps packets.
> Onething more you will have to put an ACL for your IPs. someone can use
your
> squid minor mistake :) can be..
> Keep eyes on access.log and cache.log
>
> --
>
> Best Regs,
> Masood Ahmad Shah
> System Administrator
>
> ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
> | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> | Fibre Net (Pvt) Ltd. Lahore, Pakistan
> | Tel: +92-42-6677024
> | Mobile: +92-300-4277367
> | http://www.fibre.net.pk
> | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
> Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
> (Dennis Ritchie)
> "All I want is a few minutes alone with the source code for the universe
and
> a quick recompile."
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sukhjit Singh" <sukhjits@emmtel.com>
> To: "Ahmad Masood Shah" <masood@ipsec.fibre.net.pk>; <hno@squid-cache.org>
> Cc: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 12:16 PM
> Subject: [squid-users] squid using more bandwidth!!!
>
>
> > Dear Henrik/Ahmad
> >
> > once again i need your help regarding the bandwidth usage of squid.It is
> > consuming more bandwidth than saving i doubt if it is saving anything.
> > How i found that squid is using more bandwidth is mentioned below.
> >
> > I have a proxy server with about 50 users and it is connnected to squid
> with
> > wccp.
> > The ip address of my proxy server is 202.152.128.25
> > The ip address of my squid server is 202.152.128.2
> >
> > When i check the ip accounting with a software called netflow i get the
> > following results
> > 202.152.128.2 250Kb/s ------>>when using squid+wccp
v2
> > 202.152.128.25 170Kb/s------>>when using proxy server
> > alone WITHOUT squid.
> >
> >
> > The following is the http stats.
> > current hits 199.0 req/min
> > current requests 324.0 req/min
> >
> > i have 3 scsi driver 8 GB each and they are 50% full.
> >
> > so what is the fun using squid if it is consuming bandwidth rather
saving,
> > kindly do clear me.
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Sukhjit
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Tue Jun 24 2003 - 20:19:39 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:17:36 MST