Re: [squid-users] Is ESI cached?

Robert Collins wrote:
> A few common things:
> Check your clock.

Being everything (client, squid, target HTTP server) on localhost I
don't think that clock might be an issue, anyway it's NTP synchronized
and to the best of my knowledge it's pretty much correct. :-)

> check your no_cache rules..

No no_cache rules apart from the stock one:

no_cache deny QUERY

What kinda bugs me is that the stock installation (./configure, make,
make_install) plus the following configuration:

# diff -u squid.conf.default squid.conf
--- squid.conf.default 2003-08-22 23:38:14.000000000 +0200
+++ squid.conf 2003-08-23 16:33:04.000000000 +0200
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
  # internal address:port in http_port. This way Squid will only be
  # visible on the internal address.
  # Squid normally listens to port 3128
-http_port 3128
+http_port 3128 accel defaultsite=localhost:81

  # TAG: https_port
  # Note: This option is only available if Squid is rebuilt with the
@@ -555,6 +555,10 @@
  #
  #Default:
  # none
+cache_peer 127.0.0.1 parent 81 0 no-query originserver name=localhost
+acl origin dstdomain localhost
+cache_peer_access localhost allow origin
+http_access allow origin

  # TAG: cache_peer_domain
  # Use to limit the domains for which a neighbor cache will be

is behaving in a very weird way: all I see in the logs are
TCP_CLIENT_REFRESH_MISS/200 if I try with manual telnet. If I use a
browser sometimes I get TCP_CLIENT_REFRESH_MISS/304 (which is better,
while still not enough) but still I can't manage to get a TCP_HIT
anywhere, with or without ESI. Weird, weird, weird, and definitely
different from 2.5 behaviour at a very least).

Ciao,

-- 
Gianugo Rabellino
Pro-netics s.r.l. -  http://www.pro-netics.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
     (Now blogging at: http://blogs.cocoondev.org/gianugo/)