On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Rudolf Potucek wrote:
> P.S.: I found one website that claimed that it had newer content and
> didn't want to be cached, so I assume that all the other ones
> (microsoft.com, google.com, ...) should be cacheable, right?
Right.. if it wasn't for the fact that the HTML content on these sites is
dynamically generated.
See the cacheability check engine for interesting reading on what is
cachable or not and why.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Mon Sep 15 2003 - 13:42:06 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:19:53 MST