Thanks for the interesting link, David.
But squid list is devoted to helping by sharing info. So there should be no
such thing as "reply to sender only". If everyone replies to
squid-users@squid-cache.org then atleast we have a guaranteed archive entry
which will eventually benefit other users. I don't think anyone bothers with
posting a summary here. The only group I've seen which summarises after
every problem resolution is hp unix group.
Cheers,
Prash
-----Original Message-----
From: David Brodbeck [mailto:DavidB@mail.interclean.com]
Sent: 07 May 2004 19:21
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: RE: [squid-users] one thing that annoys me
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prash [mailto:prashk@staff.btltd.net]
> Can I request the administrator to enable this "reply to:
> squid-users@squid-cache.org" please?
I prefer it the way it is. I can reply to the message author by just
hitting 'Reply', or to the list as well by hitting 'Reply To All'. It gives
more options than I'd have if Reply-To were set to the list. Besides, the
way it is now reduces list traffic by preventing accidental posts to the
list.
This article I found a while back sums up my feelings on the matter pretty
well:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Received on Fri May 07 2004 - 13:19:51 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Jun 01 2004 - 12:00:01 MDT