Re: [squid-users] suggestion ..

From: Hendrik Voigtländer <hendrik@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 15:05:28 +0200

I think, that switching over to the new machine will improve the
situation. Spec looks more than sufficient for your number of users
when you have more than one disk.

Squid will use only one processor, the second will help when deploying
squidguard or other services on this machine. I am not sure if the
second processor will be used by squid when running with aufs - ask the
list.

You have a good uplink, we serve 1000 Clients (roughly 150 connecting at
the same time) with 5Mbps ADSL with good service times.

40 GB IDE disk (4 partition, each 5 gigs for cache): Does that mean 4
partitions with 10GB with a usage of 50% (5GB)?
Using a single IDE disk is an impact on performance.
Reiserfs is known to have a good performance when used for the cache
disks, you can use ext3 for the other partitions. Use more than 80% of
available space will impact performance as well - I prefer an even lower
usage.

More Info about RAM:
http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-8.html#ss8.11

Monitor you squid with snmp and cachemgr. Look at the service times and
the general runtime information in cachemgr (
May be your machine is swapping already, this is an performance killer.

http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-9.html#ss9.24

For more information about squid perfomance look here:

http://www.devshed.com/c/a/Administration/High-Performance-Web-Caching-With-Squid

Regards, Hendrik.

andre@ictserver.digitcell.com wrote:

> My Clients about 40-50, and the uplinks is about 1 Mbps (2 Mbps
> down/1 Mbps up). if the problem is RAM and need SCSI disk,
> soon i will move on Xeon double proc 1 Gig RAM and SCSI HD.
> 128 Allocated for squid from total 256 RAM, and no other services running,
> only squid and sshd.
>
> Thanks in advance
> best regards,
>
> Andry Yudianto
>
>
> On Sat, 29 May 2004, Hendrik Voigtländer wrote:
>
>
>>How many clients do you have? What is the uplink size?
>>I would get much more RAM and more, bigger disks. SCSI, if possible.
>>Is 128MB allocated (processsize in processlist) or ist that the limit
>>you set in squid.conf?
>>
>>Regards, Hendrik.
>>
>>andre@ictserver.digitcell.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>what are the other applications running on your machine. are they slow as
>>>>well or is it only the browsing is slow.
>>>>256MB Ram is okie for a around a few users. Are you client machines
>>>>diskless nodes.
>>>
>>>
>>>There is no application or services that running on Squid machine, all
>>>dedicated to Squid and the client isn't in diskless, most of them are
>>>using winXP.
>>>
>>>Sometimes when browsing, it feel so slow to opening page. it happen like,
>>>i already browse site A but when my client opening site A they slow.
>>>
>>>is that ok allocated 128 MB for squid if the pc has 256 MB ?
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>
>>>Andry Yudianto
>>
>
Received on Sat May 29 2004 - 07:06:25 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Jun 01 2004 - 12:00:02 MDT