Re: [squid-users] 2.5STABLE9 Compile Error

I am using the ports tree in FreeBSD (via make fetch) to provide me
with the src and patches, and then building manually...

here are the patches that were applied:

squid-2.5.STABLE9-2GB.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-CONNECT_truncated.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-acl_error.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-aufs.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-aufs_shutdown.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-bzero.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-cachemgr_objects.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-config_overflow.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-ctype.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-date.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-defer_digest_fetch.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-delay_access_doc.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-disable_hostname_checks.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-dup_content_length.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-excess_data.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-extaclauth.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-ftp_EPLF.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-ftp_base_href.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-long_basic_auth.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-pid_t.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-reload_into_ims.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-setcookie.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-syslog.patch

They are being applied in alphabetical order via a shell script.. could
the patch order be the problem?

-gvb

On May 10, 2005, at 2:07 PM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, 10 May 2005, Gaylord Van Brocklin wrote:
>
>> On FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE (as of Dec 2nd)
>> gcc version 2.95.4 20020320 [FreeBSD]
>>
>> I get the following error when compiling:
>>
>> source='stmem.c' object='stmem.o' libtool=no
>> depfile='.deps/stmem.Po' tmpdepfile='.deps/stmem.TPo' depmode=gcc
>> /bin/sh ../cfgaux/depcomp gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
>> -DDEFAULT_CONFIG_FILE=\"/usr/local/squid/etc/squid.conf\" -I. -I.
>> -I../include -I. -I. -I../include -I../include -g -O2 -Wall -c
>> `test -f stmem.c || echo './'`stmem.c
>> stmem.c:70: conflicting types for `stmemFreeDataUpto'
>> protos.h:863: previous declaration of `stmemFreeDataUpto'
>
> Any patches applied?
>
> If so, which and from what dates?
>
> My guess is that you have a partially applied or out of date 2GB patch
> in your source tree, causing the function to be inconsistently
> declared.
>
> I have verified the declaration in both Squid-2.5.STABLE9, Current CVS
> and Squid-2.5.STABLE9 + all patches and in all is it consistent.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
Received on Tue May 10 2005 - 15:24:16 MDT