RE: [squid-users] mount options for cache_dir

From: Ilker GOKHAN <ilker.gokhan@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 17:27:52 +0300

Hi,

> >
> >However, some researches documented that reiserfs is not
> good FS for things
> >like squid cache and that ext3 is faster...

As far as I remember there was a benchmarking test which was done by Duane.
According to this report, ext2 with async (aufs) is one the best choice.

Please correct me If I am wrong..

Best regards,
Ilker G.
Received on Thu May 26 2005 - 08:28:29 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [squid-users] can squid work with cisco oix"
Previous message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [squid-users] Squid Passwords - how do i change?"
Maybe in reply to: Askar Ali: "[squid-users] mount options for cache_dir"
Next in thread: Henrik Nordstrom: "RE: [squid-users] mount options for cache_dir"
Reply: Henrik Nordstrom: "RE: [squid-users] mount options for cache_dir"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Jun 01 2005 - 12:00:03 MDT