Re: [squid-users] mount options for cache_dir

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 07:51:41 +0200 (CEST)

On Thu, 26 May 2005, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:

> However, some researches documented that reiserfs is not good FS for things
> like squid cache and that ext3 is faster...

And several has the exact opposite results..

Regards
Henrik
Received on Thu May 26 2005 - 23:51:42 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Henrik Nordstrom: "RE: [squid-users] Squid authentication and Active Directory"
Previous message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [squid-users] ntlm tutorials"
In reply to: Matus UHLAR - fantomas: "Re: [squid-users] mount options for cache_dir"
Next in thread: Matus UHLAR - fantomas: "Re: [squid-users] mount options for cache_dir"
Reply: Matus UHLAR - fantomas: "Re: [squid-users] mount options for cache_dir"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Jun 01 2005 - 12:00:03 MDT