For the read timeout, What is your oppinion?
is 5 min. suitable?
On 6/7/06, Mehdi Sarmadi <msarmadi@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Henrik
> It could be right, but this value was because of the performance
> that I wanted for fast reply.
> I hope the problem were this timeout value.
> But, you know, this problem is recently occured, and the
> configuration you see is not changed for months.
> Any other clue?!
>
> Anyway, Thank you very much
>
>
> P.S. "Oops! ;)"
>
> On 6/7/06, Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net> wrote:
> > ons 2006-06-07 klockan 20:31 +0330 skrev Mehdi Sarmadi:
> >
> > > # timouts
> > > read_timeout 1 minutes
> >
> > Are you sure you really want this? This could be causing your problem if
> > the server accepting the upload takes some time to process the upload..
> >
> > Regards
> > Henrik
> >
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> > iD8DBQBEhwhUB5pTNio2V7IRAipOAKDAbwsJ37569Di5IvlZRolPN0LutwCbBdDq
> > c9u20R6J1m26yZrM1piKeBw=
> > =P5sE
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Mehdi Sarmadi
>
-- Mehdi SarmadiReceived on Wed Jun 07 2006 - 11:19:19 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 12:00:01 MDT