On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007, Mark Powell wrote:
>>> I'd stay away from the posix AIO code though; its reasonably naive and
>>> was meant for development. I know how to make it more "optimal" and suited
>>> to production use but it'd take time I don't have. :(
>>
>> Do you mean I should be using the kernel module or not?
>> I assume that it will use the kernel code when:
>>
>> #define USE_AUFSOPS 0
>
> Well, there's a build option for it; it'll set that #define appropriately.
It seems like you are telling me not to use the POSIX AIO code, optionally
built into squid, for production use?
Therefore, I should compile with USE_AUFSOPS=0 and rely on the FreeBSD
kernel posix AIO code instead?
That's the behaviour that USE_AUFSOPS toggles right?
Cheers.
BTW I'll still test your patch with the POSIX AIO code built into squid
(which is what you've kinda requested?)
-- Mark Powell - UNIX System Administrator - The University of Salford Information Services Division, Clifford Whitworth Building, Salford University, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK. Tel: +44 161 295 4837 Fax: +44 161 295 5888 www.pgp.com for PGP keyReceived on Thu Apr 26 2007 - 08:00:11 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue May 01 2007 - 12:00:01 MDT