Hi Henrik,
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On tis, 2007-07-31 at 17:30 +0545, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
>
>> Now I have found out that some of our clients are using some sort of
>> proxy server to share and utilize that bandwidth which is burstable.
>
> And it's probably not Squid, and most likely does not add the discussed
> headers. More likely just standard Windows connection sharing.
>
> Might even be as simple as a NAT router connecting multiple stations.
Yes they might be just Windows ICS or simple a NAT router. I agree with
you and your reasonings.
>
>> The basic idea behind detecting child proxies is to discourage such
>> users because we have schemes which allows them to deploy any number of
>> PCs or proxies but of course with a higher price tag.
>
> I would recommend you to worry about "multiple users" instead of
> "proxies". The approach to detect those is a little different.
I will also try your approach and give more priority to "multiple users"
instead of "proxies".
I guess I will have to go up to an extra mile to accomplished this task:)
As always, thank you for your help and suggestions.
Thanking you...
>
> Regards
> Henrik
-- With best regards and good wishes, Yours sincerely, Tek Bahadur Limbu (TAG/TDG Group) Jwl Systems Department Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. Jawalakhel, Nepal http://www.wlink.com.npReceived on Tue Jul 31 2007 - 13:02:12 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Aug 01 2007 - 12:00:04 MDT