On Fri, Nov 09, 2007, Dave Raven wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> It works for the full 4 hours with a null cache directory. How would
> I see any kind of stats/information on disk IO? From the stats I can see so
> far, the disk stats don't change at all when it fails ...
That'd be because you're probably maxing the disk system out early on and
what you're seeing is a slowly-growing disk service queue?
> I'm currently using COSS, but I've also tried this with ufs and diskd (with
> the same results, just different times that it fails after).
COSS should handle small object loads better but some have reported little
benefit beyond a pair of COSS disks.
Try graphing the aggregate disk and per-disk transactions/second; I bet
you'll find it plateau'ing relatively quickly early on.
Adrian
-- - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support - - $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in WA -Received on Fri Nov 09 2007 - 15:10:07 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 12:00:02 MST