Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>> Well, what you really want to do is ignore cache-control for certain
>>> response codes
>>> (all driven through ACL matching or something.)
>>>
>>> It wouldn't be that hard to code up..
>> Already done in 3.0 and later.
>> Alongside independent request and reply controls.
>
> Where is it hiding?
>
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.0/cfgman/acl.html
acl ... http_status 200 304 ...
and:
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.0/cfgman/reply_header_access.html
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.0/cfgman/request_header_access.html
Though I think status would have no meaning or result on requests.
Amos
-- Please use Squid 2.6.STABLE20 or 3.0.STABLE5Received on Wed May 07 2008 - 12:34:07 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue May 13 2008 - 12:00:03 MDT