[squid-users] 2.7 dns res problem (probably bug)

hi
when running multiple squid instances squid cannot not resolv host names
from remote dns servers. It is necessary running named on localhost to get
clear

the failing squid instances below run on 127.0.0.2|3 and are parents for
another instance on 127.0.0.1 which is running as transparent proxy

this problem does not exist with 2.6STABLE-NN and same settings on same
machine

there are no !default dns settings in squid.conf

michel

May 31 18:10:06 wco-luc-bu squid[24299]: comm_udp_sendto: FD 6,
200.152.83.33, port 53: (49) Can't assign requested address
May 31 18:10:06 wco-luc-bu squid[24299]: idnsSendQuery: FD 6: sendto: (49)
Can't assign requested address
May 31 18:10:11 wco-luc-bu squid[24299]: comm_udp_sendto: FD 6,
200.152.83.33, port 53: (49) Can't assign requested address
May 31 18:10:11 wco-luc-bu squid[24299]: idnsSendQuery: FD 6: sendto: (49)
Can't assign requested address
May 31 18:10:21 wco-luc-bu squid[24299]: comm_udp_sendto: FD 6,
200.152.83.33, port 53: (49) Can't assign requested address
May 31 18:10:21 wco-luc-bu squid[24299]: idnsSendQuery: FD 6: sendto: (49)
Can't assign requested address
May 31 18:10:41 wco-luc-bu squid[24302]: comm_udp_sendto: FD 6,
200.152.83.33, port 53: (49) Can't assign requested address
May 31 18:10:41 wco-luc-bu squid[24302]: idnsSendQuery: FD 6: sendto: (49)
Can't assign requested address
May 31 18:10:46 wco-luc-bu squid[24302]: comm_udp_sendto: FD 6,
200.152.83.33, port 53: (49) Can't assign requested address
May 31 18:10:46 wco-luc-bu squid[24302]: idnsSendQuery: FD 6: sendto: (49)
Can't assign requested address
May 31 18:10:56 wco-luc-bu squid[24302]: comm_udp_sendto: FD 6,
200.152.83.33, port 53: (49) Can't assign requested address
May 31 18:10:56 wco-luc-bu squid[24302]: idnsSendQuery: FD 6: sendto: (49)
Can't assign requested address

...

****************************************************
Tecnologia Internet Matik http://info.matik.com.br
Sistemas Wireless para o Provedor Banda Larga
Hospedagem e Email personalizado - e claro, no Brasil.
****************************************************
Received on Sat May 31 2008 - 21:36:02 MDT